Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Motorcycles > Motorcycles II > Re: Noise Law?
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 107 Topic 865 of 24179
Post > Topic >>

Re: Noise Law?

by "SBH" <MI_Intruder@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 21, 2004 at 08:55 PM

"Buster" <buster52@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:IPSZb.28655$O9.22357@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     My friends and I where talking about new laws. One was talking about
a
> new law that will require bikes to be inspected to make sure all the
smog
> stuff is still on the bike. Not that it must be working. Dumb law, if
does
> not need to be working why check. My comment was it next step is to make
> sure the mufflers are not modified. This is part of the car smog laws.
And
> with so many Bikes having been modified to be much louder then stock. I
can
> see laws making bike be inspected to see if the muffler is working. What
do
> you think? Have Bikers made a enemy out of them selves by being so
noisy.
> And now people who do not like Bikes will use it. This Summer I was on a
> ride with a bunch who had removed the baffles. They where warring ear
plugs
> because the noise was to mush even for them.
>
> Buster

There is actually a noise law in Michigan but just not enforced. Rumor has
it they are pu****ng or already have pushed dealers to not install
aftermarket exhausts and if they do so, big fines. Obviously this is
easily
solved by the rider doing his own modification. I, for one, think noise
laws
should be enforced. I don't ride with loud pipes and really dislike many
who
do. The low rumble is cool, anything beyond is noise garbage and when one
p***** my home while I'm sleeping which causes me to wake, it doesn't make
me happy.
 




 107 Posts in Topic:
Noise Law?
"Buster" <bu  2004-02-22 00:35:52 
Re: Noise Law?
"SBH" <MI_In  2004-02-21 20:55:24 
Re: Noise Law?
Bob Mann <wiley48@[EMA  2004-02-21 20:20:46 
Re: Noise Law?
motownmoto@[EMAIL PROTECT  2004-02-22 08:04:39 
Re: Noise Law?
padams@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-02-22 01:45:47 
Re: Noise Law?
"Robert Bolton"  2004-02-21 20:39:58 
Re: Noise Law?
Kurt Kesler <news44@[E  2004-02-23 16:27:55 
Re: Noise Law?
toxictavrn@[EMAIL PROTECT  2004-02-24 13:28:11 
Re: Noise Law?
Kurt Kesler <news44@[E  2004-02-24 12:16:56 
Re: Noise Law?
Larry xlax Lovisone <n  2004-02-22 00:00:42 
Re: Noise Law?
chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-02-22 04:18:59 
Re: Noise Law?
Bownse <bownse@[EMAIL   2004-02-22 22:43:53 
Re: Noise Law?
"Chris Hornberger&qu  2004-02-22 21:22:52 
Re: Noise Law?
"Margaret M." &  2004-02-23 02:53:16 
Re: Noise Law?
"Nick - V~8395"  2004-02-22 14:20:03 
Re: Noise Law?
emore <emor@[EMAIL PRO  2004-02-22 10:59:40 
Re: Noise Law?
Larry xlax Lovisone <n  2004-02-22 14:20:51 
Re: Noise Law?
"Blank" <noo  2004-02-22 15:33:39 
Re: Noise Law?
Calgary <dlbcaldeletet  2004-02-22 16:37:49 
Re: Noise Law?
Bownse <bownse@[EMAIL   2004-02-22 22:41:36 
Re: Noise Law?
timkreitz@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2004-02-22 20:12:18 
Re: Noise Law?
wrestleantares <padams  2004-02-23 15:00:48 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-23 20:33:48 
Re: Noise Law?
wrestleantares <padams  2004-02-23 17:14:17 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-24 02:00:10 
Re: Noise Law?
"Margaret M." &  2004-02-24 00:07:13 
Re: Noise Law?
chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-02-23 18:15:23 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-24 03:54:32 
Re: Noise Law?
"Chris Hornberger&qu  2004-02-24 00:04:45 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-24 05:51:11 
Re: Noise Law?
motownmoto@[EMAIL PROTECT  2004-02-24 00:56:50 
Re: Noise Law?
timkreitz@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2004-02-24 07:54:19 
Re: Noise Law?
Timberwoof <timberwoof  2004-02-25 03:41:31 
Re: Noise Law?
timkreitz@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2004-02-25 13:49:58 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-26 02:29:17 
Re: Noise Law?
timkreitz@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2004-02-26 06:31:07 
Re: Noise Law?
wrestleantares <padams  2004-02-24 07:01:12 
Re: Noise Law?
timkreitz@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2004-02-24 08:02:48 
Re: Noise Law?
"Sunny" <sun  2004-02-24 10:21:52 
Re: Noise Law?
Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe  2004-02-24 18:42:07 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-02-24 19:58:43 
Re: Noise Law?
"Buster" <bu  2004-03-04 18:22:44 
Re: Noise Law?
toxictavrn@[EMAIL PROTECT  2004-03-04 18:39:07 
Re: Noise Law?
wrestleantares <padams  2004-02-24 17:11:51 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-24 22:56:37 
Re: Noise Law?
Timberwoof <timberwoof  2004-02-25 03:37:26 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-25 03:57:19 
Re: Noise Law?
Cam Penner <Cam.Penner  2004-02-24 20:42:11 
Re: Noise Law?
Timberwoof <timberwoof  2004-02-25 05:31:39 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-25 05:51:57 
Re: Noise Law?
Demetrius XXIV and the Gl  2004-02-25 17:45:54 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-02-25 17:56:02 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-26 00:03:55 
Re: Noise Law?
"Stephen!" <  2004-02-26 07:33:41 
Re: Noise Law?
Timberwoof <timberwoof  2004-02-25 05:31:24 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-25 06:07:12 
Re: Noise Law?
Timberwoof <timberwoof  2004-02-26 05:36:13 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-26 23:29:57 
Re: Noise Law?
Cam Penner <Cam.Penner  2004-02-26 16:01:34 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-27 05:06:40 
Re: Noise Law?
Cam Penner <Cam.Penner  2004-02-27 10:40:40 
Re: Noise Law?
emore <emor@[EMAIL PRO  2004-02-25 21:16:18 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-26 02:23:09 
Re: Noise Law?
Ari Rankum <Ari_Rankum  2004-02-26 02:24:28 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-26 02:49:53 
Re: Noise Law?
Ari Rankum <Ari_Rankum  2004-02-26 02:58:21 
Re: Noise Law?
Demetrius XXIV and the Gl  2004-02-24 19:39:42 
Re: Noise Law?
"Margaret M." &  2004-02-24 19:48:46 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-24 22:25:27 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-24 22:28:54 
Re: Noise Law?
emore <emor@[EMAIL PRO  2004-02-24 17:40:10 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-24 23:11:09 
Re: Noise Law?
emore <emor@[EMAIL PRO  2004-02-25 15:37:45 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-02-26 00:14:53 
Re: Noise Law?
timkreitz@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2004-02-24 07:49:43 
Re: Noise Law?
Howard <misterrnNOSPA  2004-02-24 19:13:44 
Re: Noise Law?
timkreitz@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2004-02-26 11:39:37 
Re: Noise Law?
timkreitz@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2004-02-24 07:35:42 
Re: Noise Law?
"Margaret M." &  2004-02-24 19:52:09 
Re: Noise Law?
"Buster" <bu  2004-03-04 19:51:39 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-03-05 00:18:14 
Re: Noise Law?
"Joe Dufu" <  2004-03-04 19:27:18 
Re: Noise Law?
"Starwolf" <  2004-03-04 20:43:59 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-03-05 02:23:34 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-03-05 05:44:56 
Re: Noise Law?
"Buster" <bu  2004-03-05 02:10:56 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-03-05 05:48:22 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-03-05 06:05:17 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-03-05 07:47:40 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-03-05 08:32:23 
Re: Noise Law?
James Clark <clark35.a  2004-03-05 11:38:22 
Re: Noise Law?
Mark Olson <olsonm@[EM  2004-03-05 21:52:24 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-03-05 23:02:19 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-03-06 04:29:26 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-03-06 05:44:31 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-03-06 06:45:19 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-03-06 19:25:41 
Re: Noise Law?
StephG <dontspammeFran  2004-03-07 01:13:47 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-03-07 06:46:30 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-03-05 08:39:00 
Re: Noise Law?
"triple rider"   2004-03-05 01:04:34 
Re: Noise Law?
"Buster" <bu  2004-03-05 02:14:29 
Re: Noise Law?
sschiffners@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-03-05 02:33:46 
Re: Noise Law?
"triple rider"   2004-03-05 02:40:25 
Re: Noise Law?
"Stephen!" <  2004-03-05 04:16:01 
Re: Noise Law?
"Stephen!" <  2004-03-05 04:05:46 
Re: Noise Law?
"Stephen!" <  2004-03-05 04:07:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Aug 20 15:06:36 CDT 2008.